UK: Parents should ask their baby’s permission before changing dirty nappy, sexuality expert says

[independent.co.uk 5/11/18]

A sexuality expert says parents should ask their child’s permission before changing their nappies – so they can set up a “culture of consent.”

Deanne Carson made the suggestion on ABC News during a segment about teaching consent to young children, and many viewers have since expressed their confusion over the idea.

According to Carson, who describes herself as a “sexuality educator, speaker, and author” on Twitter, a culture of consent needs to start at birth.

To do so, she suggested parents ask their infants questions such as: ‘I’m going to change your nappy now, is that okay?”

Because she is referring to babies, Carson admitted that they will not verbally respond.

She said: “Of course a baby is not going to respond ‘yes mum, that is awesome, I’d love to have my nappy changed.’

“But if you leave a space and wait for body language and wait to make eye contact then you are letting that child know that their response matters,” she continued.

Read more

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

 

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

7 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I thought this had to be a headline from ‘The Onion.’ This is way too ridiculous to be a legitimate suggestion.

What happens if the child starts crying? DON’T change their diaper and just leave them to wallow in their filth and contract a rash and infection?

This isn’t even based on the fear of victimizing a child, it’s based on the fear of being PERCEIVED as victimizing a child and – thus – being labeled a sex offender.

If anything, this suggestion would seem to ENCOURAGE a crime, if an adult is supposed to ASSUME non-verbal consent.

If you’re so scared to be perceived as a sexual predator that you’re asking a baby for consent to change their diaper, perhaps you should start to re-evaluate how sex offenders are perceived and – more importantly – treated.

Oh, by all means, and be certain to get the child’s consent before subjecting their “body integrity” to the assault of disease-preventing vaccines and life-saving medical treatments!! “Ribbish!”, as the Brits would say!!

As an infant, I was not asked nor did I consent to having my diaper changed. That is why I got so effed up and at age 56, viewed cp.

Here, here! Not only was I not consulted to provide consent prior to diaper changes, I was not asked before a doctor slid a scissor blade up my urethra to enlarge it at age 3, or prior to my privates being liberated from my zipper at about age 5 (thanks, Dad). I wasn’t asked before getting spanked and whipped with a belt, either. Perhaps this is what led to my criminalistic sexual behavior later in life? More importantly, who do I sue?