ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459


Monthly Meetings | Recordings (7/10 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

We have emailed a link to the conference videos to all attendees and those who purchased the videos. If you haven’t received it and it is not in your spam folder, email

conference at all4consolaws.org

 

National

OH: Man Faces 30 Years in Prison on Child Porn Charges for Taking Sexy Photos of 17-Year-Old Girlfriend When He was 20

A 27-year-old Cleveland man faces between 15 and 30 years in prison for allegedly producing child pornography. But no children were harmed by his actions: The man merely took consensual, sexually suggestive pictures of his 17-year-old girlfriend when he was 20. https://reason.com/blog/2018/07/05/sexy-pictures-17-child-porn-arrest

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 
Subscribe
Notify of
8 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Oh, the poor victim! That innocent, young girl (17) whose life is now ruined forever! 🙄
Back to reality: I sure hope the judge has some common sense and uses it in this case! Such cases are an enormous waste of taxpayers’ money!

Doubtful. Carbon copy here:

https://ethicsalarms.com/2011/03/01/outrageous-prosecution-the-eric-rinehart-story/

Meanwhile, federal prison inmate #08307-028 has a release date of February 2020. At which point, I am certain, he will have to go down to the local cop shop to have his photo taken to go on the internet along with his personal information, and do so every 90 days for the rest of his life. Also get a ‘special’ passport’.

The chiiiiildren!

The whole thing defies reason. Period!

But if that 17 year old did the same with another 17 year old, it’d be the exact same charge because that 17 year old would be charged as an adult. Does that make sense? No. Never has and never will.

Reason and common sense do not fit into the picture. Also, by the letter of the law, he should not have taken the photos. However, this is where a judge should be allowed to exercise his authority and see this case as a waste of time. Sadly, with mandatory minimums in Federal sentences, common sense goes away. District Court judges have a love/hate relationship with mandatory minimum sentences, as it ties their hands.

You can murder someone and get out in 10-15 years, then resume your life unimpeded by the government!

Pictures are more egregious than physically removing a life from this planet FOREVER?

America, you scary!

Ah the scale of Justice in full swing here!
Wtf ever happened to the punishment fitting the crime!?!
Our system truly is a lazy sack of shit.
American Justice… Pathetic

I hope he can find a way to retain counsel other than a court appointed attorney. The article doesn’t provide many details, but I’m wondering how the feds will show jurisdiction 7 years later. In these kinds of cases the federal government has to prove such photos were generated or trasmitted via interstate commerce. That can include using technology made outside the state, but who keeps phones / computers / cameras for 7+ years?

I would be surprised if his testimony implicated federal jurisdiction. Lacking that, they may have to reduce the charges to possession, which would be current because someone apparently still had the photos.

The case should be dismissed as a de minimis infraction. This sort of situation was not envisaged by the legislature when they wrote these laws. I hope the ACLU or similar organization helps him out.

8
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
.