NY: Medicaid bought sex offenders’ erectile dysfunction drugs

[whec.com – 6/5/19]

Registered sex offenders in New York received $63,000 worth of erectile dysfunction drugs and other sexual treatments courtesy of the state’s publicly funded Medicaid program, according to an audit released Wednesday.

Federal rules bar Medicaid coverage of sexual treatments for all recipients, not just sex offenders. Yet state Medicaid officials approved $930,000 in improper payments for the drugs between 2012 and 2018, according to the audit released by state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli and first reported by The Associated Press.

According to the audit, 47 of those Medicaid recipients were also state sex offenders, who are prohibited from getting Medicaid-covered sexual treatments under a state law.

Read more


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

A prime example of a databases ability to ” sort” files thereby identifying precisely the amount of $ flow. Firms have capitalized exponentially by these same action which promotes efficiency and efficacy. This quasi surgical razor can also be used to identify political competition and head them off via nefarious means. Clearly the INTENT of this article is to cut off the wasted use ( presumably) of tax $. Bizzarro world finding out sex offense justifies ostricizing from Medicaid covered sex treatment. EITHER states want to treat sexual dysfunction or not.

“State health officials dismissed much of the criticism, noting that under Medicaid rules, erectile dysfunction drugs can be prescribed to treat other conditions, such as prostate problems.

The auditors “either ignored the law or the facts, which undermines any value that can be associated with its findings,” the department said in a formal, written response to the audit.”

Nothing will prevent a re-offense more than a healthy intimate relationship with another person. Loneliness, isolation, and rejection are probably at the root of many sex offenses, it was in mine. The first thing people assume with this article is that the person is out doing something inappropriate. Also, those drugs do not make you aroused, they only allow the person to perform once aroused. So legalizing marijuana which is an aphrodisiac could be more of a risk then these drugs. Also, many of those past sex offenders were probably on Medicaid because they can’t get employment due to the punitive nature of the registry.

Would rather see these auditors go over the books of local PDs to see how they’re spending SORNA (and state counterpart) funds.

Ruining a person’s future based on their past !! Unconditional
Getting into every facet of their lives based on possible future behaviors !!! Unconditional
So, these men have sex convictions, but they are not allowed to have same human physical conditions ?
Now it’s acceptable and good to allow every person in the world to disrupt, interfere, block, hinder, control every detail.. including private lives of these men just because ….of Fear and so called high potential for future crimes !!!
Why does this sound So Wrong !!
Because it is !!!
Is someone going to stop this madness !!!
How can a defense be given when all we hear are negatives !
Let’s put Positive information out for people !!
Thanks !!

Typical click bait for the outrage mob. Not only do we have to tolerate life by living with the hate, we’re used for shock value, propaganda stories such as this.

I want to know why these two data criteria were even studied together. Prior conviction should have no tie to Personal health information. Why would this even be looked at? This was a gross overreaching of the auditors.