NE: Nebraska sex offenders testify for change in registry law

[ – 9/27/19]

Twenty-eight people who were registered sex offenders, or the wife, mother, father, brother or counselor of sex offenders, lined up to give testimony to the Legislature’s Judiciary Committee on Friday, asking for changes to the Nebraska registry law.

The Judiciary Committee embarked on a study of the sex offender registry law over the interim to determine if changes are needed and, if so, what they should be.

The registered offenders told the committee about how the registry created life-altering situations in which they couldn’t get jobs, or only the lowest-paying jobs, or were denied housing. Spouses and children were punished along with them, and in some cases their inclusion on the registry led to divorce because of the limitations it placed on their lives.

One man said he had been shot in the back because of his presence on the registry.

“Almost 6,000 Nebraska families live under discrimination and paranoia created by the registry,” said Deborah Whitt.

Families are deeply and negatively affected by the unintended burdens of this law, she said. It is unjust, and does not protect people, but rather creates in communities climates of suspicion, anxiety, hate, bullying and fear.

If offenders have served their sentences, done all the programming and therapy, why continue to discriminate against them, Whitt asked.

Read more


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Every oppressed minority group has eventually had to go public and speak out about the abuse in order to get change. The courage of these people to come forward is impressive. I hope I have the courage when my time comes.

Those 28 people who testified are the REAL patriots of this country and what it USED to stand for.

As…..the walls slowly start to crumble .

This is the continuing pushback that the Registry is getting for what it is doing to so many registrants and their friends and families. As long as the government keeps adding more people to that flawed and cancerous list the more pushback this will get.

Inevitably the Registry will collapse under its own weight by way of increasing lawsuits, hearings, and shrinking budgets LE has to endure for policing a growing population of registrants. Besides the cracks in the system are showing…

EVERYTHING has its limits.

Wow, it seems as though perhaps someone in the NE Legislature truly gets it. While I still disagree with any sort of citizen registration, I’m heartened with his tacit admission it has gone well beyond “the original purpose.” The problem, Senator, is that it’s impossible to have *any* public registry without it going beyond the original purpose. Even if it’s LE-only, the harassment LE does and will do in the name of “compliance checks” will still cause problems.
“Safety is important,” [Committee Chairman Steve] Lathrop said. “We want to make sure the original purpose of the registry is achieved, without causing all the collateral damage to people who can’t actually get on with life. … The issue is whether they are at risk to reoffend.”

It shouldn’t be designed to be an additional form of punishment, he said.
All in all this article seems to have a spin in our favor. Another chip knocked off the wall.

@ Anonymous

Just more fuel to the fire I suppose that’s heating up the Registry. LE and politicians alike are joining the ever growing community of Registrants.

Every time I look I’m amazed at the cancerous hypocrisy of the system by way of LE and politicians pretending to say one thing and doing the other.

Well guys you get to be in the receiving end of the injustices and wrongdoing that you had once perpetuated with your LIES and ARROGANCE …

Welcome to Pariah Country! Enjoy your stay…

They are protecting electronic DOMESTIC surveillance & techniques. THAT’S ALL!
Having a database of bad human is 1 thing for, indenture to the machine property another!
If state may indenture citizen man to subservience to insatiable database maintenance how far can a federal governments go?

Man, have you guys noticed how many of these articles are now linked to subscriptions? Probably just coincidence.