ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (7/10 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

Click here to sign up now for ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18
Download a PDF of the schedule


Kat’s Blog: Band-Aid Fixes

I’m not sure what’s going on in Tennessee.  Lately there seems to be an avalanche of bills proposed challenging the rights of registrants.  Most of these bills seem to serve no purpose other than to intimidate and scare the bejeezus out of registrants and then, if passed, make their lives more difficult.

Rep. Doggett has the “no registrants sleeping in a home with minor children” bill.

Rep. Griffey has his “let’s chemically castrate all registrants on parole” bill.

Now, here comes Rep. Patsy Hazlewood with HB1922 that would supposedly make it easier for registrants to attend places of worship. The registrant would need to identify themselves as a “sex offender registrant”, in writing, to the leadership of the place of worship they want to attend. They would then need “written permission” from that leader to attend religious services or any support or educational classes held there.

When I see bills such as Rep. Hazlewood’s, I’m often conflicted. Is this a genuine attempt by a legislator to put a band-aid on the enormous registry problem that they know exists or is it yet another restriction that gives the impression that the legislator is doing something to keep their constituents safe, in this case, requiring registrants to get “written permission” from (church, synagogue, temple, etc.) leaders before they are able to fully participate as part of the religious community?

From my own past experience, there is no faster or cattier grapevine than a “house of worship grapevine” And not to disrespect anyone, but pastors, priests, deacons, rabbis and other religious officials, just like anyone else, have been guilty on occasion of engaging in the gossip. So, I can only imagine the tongues wagging in the pews on Sunday morning when word is leaked that the worship leader received a letter from a “sex offender” who wants permission to participate in the congregational activities.

I frequently email legislators. Legislators propose bills that will affect you, even if you’re not in their district.  Of course, if you’re not one of their constituents and can’t be counted on to cast a ballot in their favor at the next election, you seldom receive a written response.

I emailed Rep. Hazlewood, she’s not my district representative so I had no high hopes of a response, but I wanted to understand why she thought treating registrants like 5 yr. old’s, making them get signed permission slips to attend a religious facility, was a good idea.

Surprisingly, Rep. Hazlewood responded with her impetus for the proposed HB1922, and in a nutshell, here is what she said. “Currently a parolee was prohibited from attending religious services, support and educational classes that occurred on Wednesday nights and various other days because of presence restrictions. Because of the parolee’s distance limitations and the fact that this facility has or is near daycare, schools or other childcare operations, their attendance would be prohibitive while on parole. This bill would alleviate that issue, allowing registrants to attend religious, support and or educational functions.” (In a subsequent email she indicated that this could include groups such as AA mtgs, many of which are located in religious facility community rooms.)

While I understand that Rep. Hazlewood’s proposed bill is a band-aid fix for a much larger problem and her clarification of the bill was appreciated, there remained concerns that she didn’t address. I’m not certain that she fully understands that it’s not just those on parole that have to deal with presence restrictions, those restrictions are for anyone on the registry and they extend long-after parole ends.  Also, having to get “written and signed permission” from the leader of a house of worship doesn’t quite sit well with me. Are we now bringing religion into state run registries? Do we require any kind of written and signed permission slips from any other group of former offenders?  What’s next? Will registrants be required to obtain written and signed permission slips from the grocery store manager before they can enter the store? It’s all too, too much.

I think Rep. Hazlewood’s heart is in the right place. Her bill would allow someone, I’m guessing one of her constituents, who is currently on parole, to attend worship services, support and educational groups. But this is a band-aid fix for a gaping wound we know as “the registry”.

We’ve become weary of band-aid fixes. If the registry was used as it was originally intended, most registrants wouldn’t be prohibited from so many locales in the first place. We wouldn’t need band-aid bill proposals to fix the imaginary problems that the registry itself has created.

Our representatives need to begin looking at the bigger picture. They need to address the entire registry, not try to fix it one band-aid at a time, that will never work, the infected, festering, gaping wound that the registry has become is just too big.

Whatever state you live in, keep abreast of the bills your legislators are proposing. Contact your legislators, voice your concerns, put your two cents in when it comes to bills that affect you.

Even if legislators don’t respond, you are actively participating in that which affects your life. And if we all participate and let our voices be heard, eventually we will make a difference.

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
    1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
    2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
    3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
    4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
    5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
    6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
    7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
    8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
    9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
    10. Please do not post in all Caps.
    11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
    12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
    13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
    14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
    15. Please do not solicit funds
    16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
    17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
    18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

“Our representatives need to begin looking at the bigger picture. They need to address the entire registry, not try to fix it one band-aid at a time, that will never work, the infected, festering, gaping wound that the registry has become is just too big.”

The bigger picture is that 95+% of sex crime offenders DO NOT commit another sex crime again.

On a side not, although related, is that our senate has voted not to allow witnesses in the impeachment of our current president, with soon to be (next Wednesday) an acquittal of the charges of obstruction of justice and abuse of power. This is a reflection that our government no longer respects the constitutions checks and balances and therefore will not respect the constitution at all.

Our representatives have became puppets and an authoritarian government is imminent.

I don’t buy Hazelwood’s explanation of the reasoning behind her bill. Written permission from the church to attend does’t trump state law or parole/probation terms. I don’t know why she responded, but it strikes me as plain old pandering when a politician tries to tell you that you got their proposal all wrong.

I believe this to be an approach to enter another part of RCs lives, this will open more doors to already unjust, unconstitutional Legal access to Not Help but Hinder the Rights of RCs. No matter how you turn and twist these issues it is the fabric of our lives and makes it impossible to dispute once LE and Courts/Authorities have Probable cause, this subject should be battled as Off Limits for Constitutional Grounds, Period or another Big Can of Worms will allow the Slippery lil devils to do what they wish under All Kinds of Pretenses ☹️😠😤

And the separation of church and state is where? A true church welcomes all and as soon as I am able to identify one i think i would like to attend. Know for sure I’m not holding my breath.

Give a guy behind the desk two choices: make and pass laws to tackle the hard issues that need priority in society.


Keep your job and blame the sex offenders for any and everything that you can get away with.

BTW, Trump’s executive order was forced on him to tackle ISPs and “any challenges” to their pursuit of offenders.

Use a VPN, change providers, delete/minimize your online presence as much as you can. Try not to use keywords that are obvious or names or data that could be used against you. Flush, default all devices regularly. Live as much as you can without these devices, go low-tech. Regularly unplug your internet and especially when leaving the house. Turn off location services in your phone. Do NOT Google anything, use alternatives to ALL mainstream services. Learn a new OS.

They want to hang people on ANY detail they can so you need to minimize that. The infiltration is happening on all levels. Even judicial, many judges are being pushed out and replaced by former district attorneys. The few good judges are losing their ability to help defendants as they keep getting preempted by legislation.

Nextdoor “vigilantes” are parking around cracking wifi or scanning for devices. Once they have your device’s MAC address they can clone/spoof it and send fake emails, messages, searches, you name it. Then they can report back to the cops and all they need is to get a warrant for your internet or cellular provider’s records (with their new executive authorization) and the district attorneys can build any case against you.

Keep a strong heart.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x