General Comments May 2021

Comments that are not specific to a certain post should go here, for the month of May 2021. Contributions should relate to the cause and goals of this organization and please, keep it courteous and civil. This section is not intended for posting links to news articles without additional relevant comment.

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Here is a thorough explanation of domestic and international travel restrictions and covers requirements of visitation to other states as well as requirements for leaving and returning to the U.S. it was updated 11/20 , so is current.

Aero1 is a troll.

Has anyone been able to remove their info from the ‘citydata’ site. I am not on the public registry, yet am listed on this sight.

If you live in Los Angeles County, here’s an interesting website:

Does anyone have any citations to any CA SC cases that have stated that the registry does not violate privacy issues under CA constitution, or that the state does not have to conduct determination hearings for SO under CA constitution? I need any and all cases by the CA SC concerning SO and registration.

IDK if anyone else saw this article but to me it once again highlights the uselessness of the registry, at least as far as its stated purpose:

From the article:

Federal prosecutors said [the doctor] intentionally targeted girls in Ashland County — some 90 miles from his Youngstown home — to avoid being spotted by anyone he knew.

1) The offender wasn’t on the registry.
2) Even if on the registry, he traveled outside his home area to commit the acts.
3) Even if on the registry, girls aged 12-15 typically don’t look at ML to screen people.

I’ll save commentary on the culpability of the girls but the fact there were at times groups of them and that they were sneaking into hotels sure says lots to me.

Another “victory” for the powerful ML!

Nned some assistance on the internet exclusion form. When I filed mine it was handled by my attorney, but a fellow registrant is applying and asked for help. They were in group with me for same CP offense. My question is,

Since they have had a 17b, which box is checked in the reason for exclusion section.
The last box says felony 311, but theirs is now a misdemeanor.


These two are accused with shooting and killing a 6 year old boy. Surely they’ll have to register as child abusers, right?

This is weird….

“He faces a felony count of being a sex offender who failed to register, second offense; a felony count of being a sex offender who failed annual verification, second offense…”

The second charge – ” failed annual verification” – sounds as if he is being charged because the cops were unable to verify his residence. 🤔

Thank goodness the poor girl was found safe. I was so worried! 😏
Oh wait, no, I wasn’t ….. because this was yet another stupid Amber Alert about a non-custodial parent abduction. 🙄🤨

Honestly, just like the fact that Registries are overpopulated and made useless by listing the vast majority of individuals at very low risk of reoffending, these stupid Amber Alerts have become rather meaningless because they nearly always involve non-custodial parents. So if a real abduction were to take place, would anyone pay any attention to the Amber Alert? 🤔🤷🏻‍♂️