ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (10/16 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

We have emailed a link to the conference videos to all attendees and those who purchased the videos. If you haven’t received it and it is not in your spam folder, email

conference at all4consolaws dot org


Action ItemsGeneral News

Action Alert: Call before Aug 26 to support the Jeremy Rose family against job discrimination

Women Against Registry (W.A.R.) 8/24/21


We are all in this together so please take action as soon as possible and certainly before the program airs on KSTU-FOX 13 on August 26 in the evening!

We were contacted by a registered citizen in Salt Lake City Utah a few months back. He was being vilified by Fox13 television station due to a grievance a vengeful female had against the director for kicking her son out of the group which had nothing to do with him. He was there along with that director to assemble a prop for their program. He had not been under supervision for over two years but, he and his wife continued with the protocols to protect themselves. Matt Duhamel, The Unspoken Offender did a YouTube video with Jeremy at that time.

Click here to watch that video

I received a communication from Jeremy and called him. After all the drama and trauma he and his family moved to another area and a new school for his children. Now that same television station and reporter are running teasers all week to get the public to tune in Thursday night for a follow-up investigation. The television station is using the previously mandated protocol in this story as the reason for the upcoming piece, but Jeremy is ‘no longer’ on supervision and as we know is therefore not mandated to use the prior protocol. Therefore, there is no story there! Jeremy and his wife continued to use the protocol on their own to protect their family from slanderous and destructive stories like this one.

Click here to watch the destructive story

We are asking all members and supporters to stop what you are doing and call FOX 13 television station or email them and politely let them know you are a registrant family and support the Jeremy Rose family. If you have young folks who are aware of your family situation and can call the station with your supervision and tell them about your family experience that would be perfect.

WAR National Directors

Call the main KSTU-FOX 13 number: (801) 532-1300 then ask to speak with the news director, Mr. Sternfield.

Or email the News Tips, Story Ideas & Comments:

Or email Marc Sternfield – Sr. Director of News:


We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Email sent, this is really sad.

I sent email also,
So if you cannot provide for your family for housing even if they approve you, and you all become homeless. I propose we should move our belongings to the steps of your local courthouse. Maybe they will get a better idea of punnishment?

Okay. Will do! 👍🏻

I made a call

Now correct me if I’m wrong. But has anyone tried to go after these news outlets for defamation? Think about it the legislators created this as a person who commits a sex offense is someone who is to register will be sex offender registry. But to call someone a sex offender is saying that is who they are in this moment. Which we are not. We are just a person providing by the law who has to register on the registry. I think a news outlet calling someone like Jeremy a sex offender is a false statement about the person. He is a person who committed a sex offense in the past and has to register on the sex offender registry. But his identity is not a sex offender. Most judges agree that the name sex offender carries a Scarlet letter and has negative consequences. So publicly calling someone that for your own personal gain views and to make money on your news outlet while damaging this person’s reputation was trying to make it start with his family, seems borderline defamation to me. I don’t know, what do you guys think?


Yes you are correct but it is not unlawful as the state and federal gov’t has ALREADY

made the information available to all. Yes it causes horrible consequences and that is

why in Calif. in 1947 sex offender information was ONLY available to LE.

I don’t recall seeing any legal actions against news outlets. I haven’t thought much about it but I can’t imagine a person would be successful with any action against anyone/anything simply because they called him/her “sex offender”. The criminal regimes put “sex offender registry” on their web sites and everywhere else. They have used “sex offender” forever and it is commonly used. I don’t think anyone would have an action against it.

Having said that, of course “calling someone like Jeremy a sex offender is a false statement about the person.” It is false and inaccurate. But most people who say “sex offender” are just your normal lazy, clueless, brainless person living in America. They aren’t really doing it “on purpose”. They just can’t be bothered to improve themselves or be any better. But anyone with a brain who has thought much about it and still says “sex offender”, is a lying, hateful piece of excrement.

People who are listed on the Oppression Lists (OLs) are just People Forced to Register (PFRs). Not “required” to Register, but “forced” to Register. At the point of guns, by criminal regimes. It’s an act of hate mongering and war. In America, we are not all in this together. No one should ever forget that we are a divided country, it’s intentional, and as long as the OLs exist, it’s desired.

I think what would likely matter in a defamation case like this is what is actually meant by the term sex offender. Using plain English calling people who in the past committed an offense but isn’t currently (or recently) committed one a sex offender might pass as defamation but the legal definition re-defines that plain English definition generally as someone who has ever committed an offense which is within specific set of offenses and may even include non convicted people in some cases. Further, its obvious that when a person is referred to as a sex offender it generally doesn’t mean the plain English definition but rather more along the lines of the legal one even though this may confuse some people into believing a person with that label is more dangerous than they actually are. It would be almost impossible to overcome this for anyone who was previously convicted of a sex offense.

Good input y’all. Just wanted to pick some brains

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x