KS: Kansas Supreme Court Holds Registration Violation is a Strict Liability Crime

Source: floridaactioncommittee.org 7/31/22

Not knowing you have to register something or not having the mental capacity to understand how to register is not a defense to a registration violation according to the Supreme Court of Kansas.

A person required to register in Kansas was convicted of a failure to register offense. He was required to report quarterly, every May, August, November, and February, plus changes.On September 18, he went in to report a change of phone number. He went in again on October 9 to report an address change. But he failed to show up for his registration appointment in November, instead coming in again on December 15th to register. He was arrested for missing the November registration.

Read the full article


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

How can you get arrested for something strictly administrative?

Mother effers.

What I’m not seeing is elderly getting slammed with FTR due to
dementia, but I can’t believe it doesn’t happen. As the million+ PFR population ages, I’d expect to
see either an increase or, ideally, protocols for the Stasi to follow for old folks.There’s must be thousands of PFR’s too old to remember to schedule registration appointments, let alone get themselves to the appointment.
What happens to them/us?

We are all safer now that he is behind bars for this… Let the children play!!
What clowns

Kansas needs to get on board with Michigan’s 6th Circuit where the judge ruled registrants can’t be held liable for unintentionally violating sora rules.

My state, and most states (including the Fed), have a “knowingly” standard attached to FTR. Any state’s have an “Intentional” standard? I saw we want to keep an eye on this to see if other states will change their laws so that it is a strict liability crime.

What Is Strict Liability? Under criminal law, strict liability crimes are actions that are considered to be criminal regardless of the person’s intentions. Defendants for strict liability crimes will be convicted even if they were not aware that their actions were criminal and even if they had no criminal intent.

No wonder the best time to drive through KS is the dark of the night because everything else is ugly there, including the legal brain trust. This line of thought the court brings forth is something out of old England where dungeons and other punishments were used because they could. Did not know you couldn’t look sideways at high noon on a given day? Too bad, you did and therefore, to the rack you go!

Again, to expect everyone to know the rule of law in a particular place just because they are there, visiting or otherwise, is crazy when one considers the laws on the books for each jurisdiction are usually voluminous and would take weeks to read.

Strict liability for the individual, but intermediate scrutiny for SCOTUS weighing congressional Acts applied subsequent to conviction for already codified crimes. Precisely the inverse disposition ratified under the Bill of rights. Child Sexual assault carries the same strict liability. Big tech was able to avoid such liabilities now weren’t they.