Canada: Luring pedophiles through fake online ads is not entrapment, Supreme Court says

Source: cbc.ca 11/24/22

The Supreme Court of Canada has ruled that online police investigations targeting adults looking to have sex with children do not constitute police entrapment.

In a rare 9-0 ruling, the top court dismissed the appeals of four men convicted of child sex offences: Ontario residents Corey Daniel Ramelson, Muhammad Abbas Jaffer, Erhard Haniffa and Temitope Dare.

An investigation by York Regional Police called Project Raphael ran from 2014 to 2017. It involved undercover police officers posing as teenaged escorts on a website they suspected of being a hub for the sexual exploitation of children. 

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

17 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Another terrible law. When will they start prosecuting people for alleged thoughts. Because prosecuting for intent is the same thing.

More bait and switch tactics at play here. Seem like these cowards that call themselves LE can’t lure predators posing as actual children. They need to pose as adults, get the person emotionally and probably physically enticed, and then drop in the fine print at the very end of the deal. Probably the most pathetic conduct possible while acting under the color of law, but they’d make mighty fine used car salesmen if you ask me. I think they missed their calling.

any ADULT that PRETENDS to be a CHILD online is there for ONE reason to ENTRAP/LIE and LURE IN a ADULT by pretending to be a CHILD. They arent there to get a free ticket into disney.

When a PREDATOR goes to court on underaged charges the GOVERNMENT should be able to produce a REAL UNDERAGED VICTIM or charges should be DROPPED. Quit wasting COURT TIME and TAXPAYERS MONEY !!

How best to lure in Canadian Mounties into overreaching? That is the question. How did law enforcement get into the internet advertisement business? That is the question. (see eff.org)
The DDI taking pimpin to another level.lol

Wisconsin is well known for our associated Tavern Leagues. These beer lobby unions found it necessary to ask the WI legislature for a law granting tavern owners the ability to civilly sue future potential customers (those under legal drinking age attempting to buy).
Why would any business forsake real sales for the ability to attack those who’d eventually become customers? To keep the tavern owners from being busted by LEO for serving alcohol to under age persons. The reality was local cops were enlisting underage (<21) college students and recently graduated high school kids to make “straw purchase” attempts to buy in local bars and taverns. These participants, more often than not, were taking criminal justice & social work college courses! Some cops began turning it into a blackmail scheme taking cash to drop cases or counts. These underage kids always came in pairs or small groups, and often were accompanied by 1 person above the legal age in the group. Usually the oldest would be the first to buy followed by the underage participants. Usually the orders was for “take out” purposes. WI regulation states All WI take out alcohol sales must end before 9:00 pm for all establishments. Inside taverns and bars premises alcohol sales must end at 1:45 am. This ” socially driven carve out” forces the entirety of alcohol sales market into taverns after 9:00pm in WI. Because LEO knows where the drinking market is, they also know where to set up shop.
The very same dynamic is playing out with this Canadian escapade for social good. Pointedly, Canadian police are admitting the DDI has no capacity for prophylaxis impacting “sexual deviance.” If anything the DDI has enabled crime or exacerbated criminality. I have read many cases where respondents to online sex adverts have showed up only to get robbed. So Caveat emptor! Just don’t expect your gov to fix it.

A few years ago, I received a voice mail message on my phone that sounded like a child, it said “Meet me in the backyard of at ### Third Steet a 2 p.m.”. I did not go. I often wondered if this was sting. My survival platform if it has anything to do with kids, I avoid it like a deadly plague, because it is deadly.

It’s almost 2023 anybody still getting busted in these online stings, knowing that internet sex crimes are automatically placed in Tier 3, has got to have some kind of mental disorder and probably deserves what ever treatment the state has to offer them through rehabilitation.

One minute there talking about the unconstitutionality of the registry and the next there hiring more con artists for there sting operation to boost registry numbers!