CINCINNATI, Ohio — An appeals court on Monday rebuffed the U.S. Attorney’s Office’s attempt to overturn a Cleveland federal judge’s decision to give the lowest possible sentence to a man who downloaded and shared child pornography. Full Article
Related posts
-
A $5 Billion Proposal to Fight Online Child Sexual Abuse
New legislation would try to curb the illegal imagery with record levels of funding for law... -
Why Will This FBI Agent Not Be Prosecuted for Child Porn?
We don’t know why the Department of Justice declined to prosecute the supervisory FBI analyst who... -
Should psychotherapists be required to report patients who look at child porn?
For years, California law required psychotherapists to report any patient who admitted developing, duplicating, printing or...
Lowest possible sentence? That is an incorrect statement. The lowest possible sentence would have been no prison time. I know of someone who had two years of house arrest and probation at the same time plus a few years afterwards. Who knows what the actual lowest sentence could have been, but that certainly was not it.