Board wants to remove low-risk sex offenders from registry

Sacramento — The state board that oversees California’s sex offender registration laws wants to thin out and overhaul the registry because they say it has grown too big and does not help law enforcement or the public differentiate between offenders who pose significant risks and those not likely to reoffend. Full Article


Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  4. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Use person-first language.
  5. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  6. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  7. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  8. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  9. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  10. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  11. Please do not post in all Caps.
  12. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  13. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  14. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  15. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  16. Please do not solicit funds
  17. No discussions about weapons
  18. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  19. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  20. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  21. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  22. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify their name. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

dr…I think Janice and RSOL are trying to establish better ground to fight on. When we get a tiered system in place I see it as a starting point not an end all. The tiered system gives us something to chip away at. I understand the frustrations of being on the registry for a life time, but remember we just recently stepped into the information age. Most of those making laws are out-dated and like me are from a different way of thinking. TRUTH and TIME will make things right. Change is the only constant,,,we just need to continue to engage, engage, engage! Just having this dialog brings us closer to the changes needed. Stand strong.

According to research conducted by Dr. Karl Hanson, a PhD psychologist recognized as the world’s leading expert, a person who does not commit a new sex offense within 17 years has the same likelihood of committing a sex offense as someone who has never committed a sex offense. California RSOL has used this argument to persuade elected officials that either such a person does not belong on the registry or everyone belongs on the registry. We will continue to make that argument next year when a new tiered registry bill is introduced.

Here’s a “backdoor” route to get to Janice’s interview on KFI:

The iHeart Radio system is a train wreck! The link above will send you straight to the mp3 file, and it should play on just about any device.

By the way, AWESOME JOB, Janice! As far as listening to people like Bill Carroll go on and on, I can certainly understand why KFI’s ratings have collapsed in the past couple of years. Sorry, I just think the guy’s annoying. But, Janice was wonderful on there.

I do under stand and thank you Janice for all your help.

Getting information made public regarding proposed changes in the registry is a huge step forward. Information based on fact to be absorbed by the masses is my opinion key. The proposed recommendation regarding a tiered system for the Registry made the front page of the San Francisco Chronicle Sunday edition.

The bottom line is this! This is very similar to the civil rights movement! Change takes time. The Federal Judge ruling the parks/beach/library bans unconstitutional is HUGE! Otherwise , more and more bans/laws would continue to arise yearly! We could be facing a ban on malls or? The idea of a government agency making this statement is huge ! Give it a little time !

I think once people realize that the abduction rate of children has little connection to the registry things will change. Thing is the media has been so successful in turning rarely occurring crimes into perceived epidemics. Don’t see them stopping soon.

Guess I must have posted in the wrong blog
MS you are totally right, we all have to band together if we are to make a difference. I have lost everything that ever meant anything to me!
My own family has turned against me. My wife divorced me,and my son has disowned me. I never laid a hand on anyone yet I am still forced to register for 25 years. I pose no threat to anyone. They have also stated that I am not a court determined sexual predator. I constantly think of suicide. It seems to be the only way out. I am 54 years old, too old to start over. I recently joined Women Against The Registry in hopes of making a difference. I encourage everyone else to do the same if you have not done so already. The public considers us all as child molesters and rapists. They need to be informed as to what the truth really is. We can talk or we can fight, but none of us can do it alone.

What a decisive issue this has become. My crime was better than yours? I am a lower risk than you? This could be a brilliant move to divide the troops. Watch out.

I believe if I’m not mistaken the registry was initially created to protect our children. However from what I have seen it has become a political theatre that exploits them. I have heard of children as young as six years old being placed on the registry. Now let’s look at this realistically, who is really doing the damage here? It is no more than a blatant lie conceived by politicians and law makers to appease the delusioned public for their own selfish gain and gratification. A quote from Josef Stalin: The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. The public will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened. It appears that someone has instilled a great deal of fear into the people of the United States. Hmm wonder who that would be, and for what reason? It seems that right around election time is always a good time to tighten the noose on the witches. Oh excuse me I meant sexoffenders!