Disgust, Dehumanization, and the Courts’ Response to Sex Offender Legislation

Sex offenders have been subject to unprecedented restrictions and punishment. The government’s treatment of sex offenders is a clear example of the dangers of laws derived from and upheld because of the emotion of disgust.

Disgust has led to a dehumanization of this category of people, which has led to a stripping of their constitutional rights. The law’s treatment of sex offenders is a clear example of why the law should eschew employing the emotion of disgust during all proceedings. In addition, the courts’, particularly the Supreme Court’s, treatment of the other branches’ actions regarding sex offenders is illustrative of why the law needs to insist upon empirical data in support of legislation and why the courts should not always defer to the other branches’ findings. Full Article (pdf) – page 8

Related posts

Notify of
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

That is one of the most informative and intelligent documents I’ve read on the subject of rso and legal issues associated with rso.

This does get under the skin of all the RC haters. I hope this can be used.

What a great article, and straight to the point. How long will it take for so many to realize that this has gotten out of hand and too far?

This country is insane now. I just read a article about civil comitment and how the prosecuter has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendent has the possibility of reoffending. Wow the possibility… Anythings possible beyond a reasonable doubt.. these judges and prosecutors are insane and the public just doesn’t care about this bs since it doesn’t effect them in any way yet but if they let these violations of rights to continue soon everything our parents grandparents and all our forefathers fought for and gave their lifes to protect will be history.

That “disgust” has permeated the whole of the RC’s life, making it nearly impossible to get justice others get, to get a job, to travel, to feel one can live a normal life. In addition, this emotional poisoning of reasonable thought has infiltrated into many an RC’s view of themselves, and I use myself as an example, having a chilling affect on most everything I do. After 15 years, I thought I would be immune to it, and get on with my life.
The good news is that it is a state of mind and has no existence outside the mind. My family is proof of that. Although they can hate the crime, they have the perspective of viewing the person, me,in my entirety and treat as a person. We can separate ourselves from the crime in our own minds, and others can do the same by getting to know us on an individual basis. I don’t know just how this is done, but I think it is the key and prerequisite to changing the legal climate.

Wow. Just wow. I really hope this is widely read.

I just came across this article which gives a biological explanation of stranger danger: http://www.livescience.com/49469-stress-inhibits-empathy.html. Could it be that if people got to know the offenders a little better, the laws would in turn become less harsh, because people would see the pain the laws inflict? And vice/versa, an offender would also feel a victim’s pain and be less likely to re-offend? The problem is that the media often enhances the aura of strangeness by using terms like “predator” or “monster” and even “victim”, and it would take a lot more than playing a video game to lessen the tension.
When I first went into group therapy, part of the program had offenders in a supervised meeting with victims. It was very stressful at first, but I remember most coming out of that feeling a little more sane and at ease.
For some reason, that program went by the wayside, maybe because funding went towards retribution and away from rehabilitation.