Estimates of the number of entries with crucial mistakes run into the tens of thousands. One man—and pretty much only one man—is trying to fix them. Full Article
Related posts
-
CA Court Blocks DOJ’s new SORNA Rule Because it Violated Due Process and First Amendment
Los Angeles: A California court last week blocked the Department of Justice’s new Sex Offender Registration and... -
Court Grants Partial Motion for Preliminary Injunction in SORNA Regulations Case
A federal district court today issued a decision granting, in part, a motion for preliminary injunction... -
Stars of 1968’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’ sue Paramount over nude scenes filmed when they were minors
Source: cnn.com 1/4/23 Actors from the 1968 film “Romeo and Juliet” have filed a lawsuit against...
There are somethings that are not worth fixing and it is best to throw it away.
Here we see them trying to put a fresh coat of paint on a rust bucket. Getting desperate, are we? It doesn’t matter if the information is “accurate” up to date or even in real time. Megan’s Law is a false and flawed premise. It simply does not give parents their power back to prevent the same thing that happened to that girl in New Jersey 21 years ago.
Knowing where someone lives simply does not minimize risk. I don’t care what your argument is for wanting to know.
Maybe we should wait until a CHILD died from having the wrong information on Megan’s law. then we can name it after a child then that might take care of the Megan law.
When we moved into our house several years ago, I looked at the Missouri State Highway Patrol sex offender search (I am not a registrant, BTW). The guy living directly behind us is a registered sex offender, and while all of the information about him was correct, the red dot showed OUR house as being where he lived. I contacted the highway patrol to tell them about this, and they fixed it. Turns out it was a bug in the mapping software that wrongly showed our house as being where the offender lived.