ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings: Nov 21, Dec 19 – Details / Recordings

Emotional Support Group Meetings 2020 (Phone only)

ACSOLCalifornia

GROVER BEACH REPEALS RESIDENCY RESTRICTIONS FOLLOWING LAWSUIT CHALLENGE

The City Council of Grover Beach, in a vote of 5 to 0, voted on September 8 to repeal a city ordinance that prohibited California sex offenders (“registrants”) from living within 2,000 feet of any school, park, or day care center. The action follows a lawsuit filed on June 17 by California Reform Sex Offender Laws President and attorney Janice Bellucci on behalf of registrant Frank Lindsay who has resided in Grover Beach for 18 years.

“This decision is important because it recognizes that residency restrictions do not increase public safety, but instead decreases it,” stated Bellucci.

According to the lawsuit, the residency restrictions effectively “banished” registrants from moving to Grover Beach or from relocating to a new residence within the city in violation of the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments, the Ex Post Facto Clause of the United States Constitution. The filing followed a recent California Supreme Court decision that repealed similar restrictions in the County of San Diego (Taylor, 60 Cal. 4th 1019, 1042).

The Grover Beach City Council admitted that they “are not thrilled” to repeal the restrictions but maintained that the city will continue to follow state law regarding registry requirements. A law enforcement representative at the Grover Beach City Council meeting on September 8 assured that his department will “remain vigilant” to guarantee compliance by registered citizens.

A recent report issued by the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation found that less than one percent of registrants on parole re-offend regardless of where they reside. A California Sex Offender Management Board (CASOMB) report issued in April 2015 cites Dr. Karl Hanson, the preeminent researcher of sex offenses, stating that a registrant who has remained offense-free 17 years is no more likely to commit a new offense than someone who has never been convicted of a sex offense. Plaintiff Lindsay has remained offense-free for 36 years.

An additional CASOMB report, issued in August 2011, determined homeless registrants pose a greater risk and utilize more law enforcement resources than registrants with residences and employment.

Subsequent to the Supreme Court’s decision, the County of Riverside and Cities of Downey and El Monte have begun the repeal of their residency restrictions. Lawsuits are currently pending in the Cities of Arcadia and Cypress with additional lawsuits expected to be filed soon in additional cities and counties throughout the State.

Related

Grover Beach moves to lessen rules on where sex offenders can live

Grover Beach repeals sex offender residency restrictions

Join the discussion

  1. MarkW-SF

    Congratulations, Janice and Frank!
    Positive news!

  2. jo

    Nice work Team!

  3. David

    Awesome! Way to go, Janice and Frank!

  4. MM

    Awesome news. Way to go Janice & Frank ….

  5. Q

    Take that Mr and Mrs Runner !!! 🙂

    What a ludicrous statement,

    “A law enforcement representative at the Grover Beach City Council meeting on September 8 assured that his department will “remain vigilant” to guarantee compliance by registered citizens.”

    Apparently this law enforcement representative is just one more ignorant of the facts fool who doesn’t know what he is talking about.

    Ignorance is a choice.

    • j

      Ignorance is a choice, but to hide behind a badge and spew ignorance and hate is a cardinal sin…

      • PR

        Well said j

      • Q

        Hi j;

        “To hide behind a badge and spew ignorance” should be a crime. Those kind of statements are a demonstration of the lack of knowledge and out right ignorance of the majority of those that work in LE. When I hear those kind of statements I know I am reading the words of a below average LE official.

  6. PR

    This is great news!

  7. me

    Well that’s great news. Now maybe I move to that town

  8. Steve S

    This is great news. All residency restrictions should be removed everywhere. I have heard that there are many cities and counties are removing these restrictions. Is there a list of cities/counties that currently don’t enforce these restrictions? I have a house that I own and want to live there but if I did, I would be in violation of the current law so I am currently homeless.

  9. USA

    Grover Beach should be commended for doing the write thing. These illegal ordinances do nothing more than provide s false sense of safety and the recent studies showing the recidivism rate and ect should substantiate that. Now, I’m beginning to wonder what the City of Cypress is thinking? Cypress has probably the highest number of elicit massage parlors offering sex, than any other city in Orange County. Some of the parlors are near cemeteries, schools, shopping centers and even schools? So I ask you, is it better to allow massage parlors (some have existed for years) that offer sexual services/one even offers nuru massages (the masseuse is fully nude/body to body) or prohibit s msn to live with his girlfriend 20 years after his offense? Who solicits these establishments? What are the police doing about this? How have they continued to operate so long? Cypress, wake up! CA RSOL, contact me with any clarifications. Thank you

Leave a Reply

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

.