ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (7/10 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

Click here to sign up now for ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18
Download a PDF of the schedule


FL: Court Rules Public Has Access to Sex Offender Hearings

An appeals court has ruled the public cannot be excluded from a courtroom when a judge is considering whether a sex offender should be committed indefinitely after his prison sentence has expired. Judge Jack Tuter gave NBC 6 permission to bring a camera into the courtroom.

But the attorney for Corey Lake, a sexually violent sexual predator whose 13-year prison sentence expired in 2012, objected. Assistant public defender Rob Jakovich argued details of confidential treatment records would be exposed in open court, unless the public was barred. …

Because ___ was seeking to prove he deserves to be released from the civil commitment center for sexually violent predators, he “does not have the same expectation of privacy of an ordinary citizen in his medical records,” the court found, adding “___ ‘s limited privacy interest in the treatment record is dwarfed by the strong presumption of openness in court proceedings.” Full Article


We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
    1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
    2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
    3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
    4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
    5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
    6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
    7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
    8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
    9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
    10. Please do not post in all Caps.
    11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
    12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
    13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
    14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
    15. Please do not solicit funds
    16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
    17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
    18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

But doesn’t this directly violate Federal HIPPA laws? You can’t go onto break another law in the process of saying it’s okay to release medical records by way of court hearings.

Doesn’t listing scars on the Megan’s Law web site directly violate Federal HIPAA laws? I have seen a listing that says: Chest / Open Heart Surgery.


In some county jails in California, they strip you nearly naked and take photos of any scars and birthmarks and place them into a database. You cannot opt out. This is done at processing and even if you are found not guilty of a crime, your DNA, photos and other information collected is made avaialble for law enforcement and now in turn, some of that information is shared with the public.

In Fresno County, they have a system called ShareNET. I don’t doubt for a second that system is duplicated across many agencies and counties, even in other states. The system is scary. It’s “protected” via usernames/passwords. We all know just how much fail usernames/passwords are for security. The system is exposed to the web, available in a Google search. Scary.

Collecting medical information on an individual against their will should be a crime if is not already. That is private unless you can’t help but show it. (On face, hands, etc). Likewise, dissemination of this information that is private should be a felony to everyone who participates in dissemination of this information.

I wonder just who must adhere to HIPPA laws. Are law enforcement officials exempt from HIPPA laws.

Sometimes, information needs to be private. ESPECIALLY information about a person’s body and a person’s medical history.

What about woman who have stretch marks or scars from caesarean sections and they then go to jail and get this information documented? That information shows up on a mugshot website. Then when she eventually wants to date someone that other person does a google search and then decides they don’t want to be with her because she’s got unsightly scars without ever getting to know the woman. It’s an invasion of privacy. Plain and simple.

Some day this ruling will come back to bite them on the ass. Makes me also think these Judges are Elected.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x