ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (6/12 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

Click here to sign up now for ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18
Download a PDF of the schedule

General News

Sex-offender registries: How the Wetterling abduction changed the country

After Jacob Wetterling was abducted in 1989, a pastor named Thomas Gillespie of the St. Joseph Parish offered support and comfort to the Wetterling family. He invited them to dinner, opened the church for a community prayer service and presented them with hot cross buns at Easter. What the Wetterlings did not know at the time was that Gillespie was a sex offender who admitted molesting a boy in the 1970s and was finally removed from the ministry in 1996. Full Article

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please do not solicit funds
  • If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  • All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I continue reading stories, studies and statistics like this one. I only wish these kinds of stories and statistics would result in change. I really want my life back

The argument needs to be made that people whom are FORCED to register are not a confirmed or verified safety threat or a legitimate public safety concern. It’s too speculative, anticipatory and preemptive to suggest that being placed on the registry can be a deterrent for future criminal activity.

Can’t we all agree that there’s no such thing as a “safe neighborhood?”

The argument also needs to be made where the community notification simply does not minimize risk in any capacity.

The “I want to know” false entitlement argument from the registry proponents also needs to be attacked and dealt with.

Also, non-violent, non-contact offenses should not be required to register.

(No, I’m not new here).

Some good points [LM]and along those same lines:
The mental health community needs to be accountable for their statements and actions which have emblazoned registrants as serial offenders which can only be controlled by either incarceration or extensive therapy sessions.
And yet the extensive and expensive therapies fails to yield any noticeable validations of effective results relieving patients of their original diagnosis and the need to be monitored.
It’s no wonder that the general public retains their conclusion that registrants can’t control their fiendish desires.
Certainly, we can all understand some offenders who can’t or won’t respond to effective treatment but unfortunately the bulk of offenders still remain on the registry with little or no means to prove their rehabilitation.
And why should it even be up to the patient to prove their improvement? Isn’t that the duty of the professional treating them? Until the therapeutic community can begin demonstrating their skills as relevant, they should be ordered to cease and desist any treatment of anyone diagnosed as having a sexual malady unless it is offered voluntarily with no cost .
Furthermore, no court should impose psychological treatment of an offender until it has been proven to actually be of a benefit to the person being sentenced and the community.

I realize a conviction is public domain, what bothers me is when your present location becomes public domain. The registry is opening the original record to modification and mistakes, and your present location and present identifiers are adding to your public record, modifying that record with no new conviction to justify the modification. It’s screwed up. How can one trust any public record, that’s pulled up every year and edited?

I was thinking about the Lindberg baby kidnapping way back in the last century. No I was not there, but I remember seeing a documentary about Lindberg. That was a big media event of the time and a tragic event for the parents and the nation, but I can’t think of any big new laws that came out of that or a decades long histeria following it. What has become of us since then, that any shocking event is met with extreme reworking of our laws?

Oh, but there was: the Lindbergh Law. It federalized the crime of crossing state lines so that the Feds could step in to investigate kidnappings more easily than (they claimed) could local jurisdictions.

That doesn’t seem very extreme, but I haven’t heard of that or its pros and cons. Is there a book that traces the history of sx offender laws back before Wetterling?

No, it doesn’t seem so extreme but, you gotta start somewhere.

On the other hand, asserting federal jurisdiction IS a big deal in the history of sex crime prosecution. It’s had a huge impact on criminal jurisprudence. Just look at AWA to see the logical progression.

The only book which comes immediately to mind about the history of sex crime law is Jesse Bering’s “Perv”, although I haven’t read it.

I suspect that I would find it typically solicitous to vanilla gays (and fetishists) and less critical of policies towards more unpopular populations. Still, he is certainly a (comparatively) very moderate voice in the greater maelstrom of hysteria.

There is a very great book by James Kincaid, “Erotic Innocence: The Culture of Child Molesting.”

The title is a bit off-putting but his analysis is very good.

Thank you for the reads. I think though, in the long run,the federal government will have to be the one to reign in the extreme laws passed in states and localities. That is what has happened in the civil rights theatre in the past.

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x