ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (7/10 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings

Click here to sign up now for ACSOL’s Online EPIC Conference: Empowered People Inspiring Change Sept 17-18
Download a PDF of the schedule


IL: Wayside residents sue City of Aurora, challenge state’s residency laws for registered sex offenders

The 19 child sex offenders who were told they must leave Wayside Cross Ministries by July 26 have filed a civil federal lawsuit against the city of Aurora, arguing the men should not have to move and challenging the state’s residency laws for registered sex offenders. Full Article

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
    1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
    2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
    3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
    4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
    5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
    6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
    7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
    8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
    9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
    10. Please do not post in all Caps.
    11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
    12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
    13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
    14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
    15. Please do not solicit funds
    16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
    17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
    18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

This would be laughable if it weren’t hurting people. Are the law makers not able to see the absurdity of this? First off, the men are in a program that is trying to help them, and the city thinks kicking them out to be homeless is somehow going to protect kids, when in fact the homeless residents may be forced to live in the bushes in the park. Second they are arguing over feet–really? So if they are 450 feet from the park the kids are in danger, but if they are 550 feet from the park all is good and we can rest easy. There was a guy in our community, not an SO, but a violent felon on a GPS monitor, on probation who got in a shootout with police, he was in a stolen car, had a hand gun, and was running from police, all while on a GPS monitor. The secret is that if the person wants to do better they will, if they don’t, they probably won’t. So the key is to make people feel worthy and productive so they want to change. Making them feel unwanted and shunned is hardly going to help the problem.

A federal suit based on a few feet. Go figure.

Good for them! If I recall in the initial article, the residence wasnt a problem until the city installed some playground equipment and it was after they moved in, which is complete bull. If they (we) let this go, that city or any other like it with residency restrictions could use this as a template for how to remove rc’s from any community easy peasy. I couldnt imagine being forced out of my home due to a micro playground being built just to remove me and always having to worry about when I would get focred out of the next place and where would live after that….100% permanently destabilized.

What bothers me about this lawsuit is they’re not going after the residency restriction itself, just the application of it based on the location of and the distance between the building and the playground equipment. I wonder if they’re gun-shy based on past IL and 7th CCoA decisions. Although, I gotta figure at some point the restriction itself may come under discussion.

And in a sign of the complete idiocy of the restriction itself:
“Wayside is offering to secure agreements from the men to not enter portions of the property that are less than 500 feet from the park and gather statements from Wayside staff describing the precise supervision and restriction placed on the men, the suit states.”
So a RC *inside* the shelter–with the only usable exit being away from the park–is a threat if less than 500 feet away? Does the RC have the ability to walk through walls, or how does this even come close to rational (or even sane)?

I can walk through walls, can’t you?

You should start with staring at goats and try to kill them with just your will, alone.

A Law that solves what problem???

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x