ACSOL’s Conference Calls

Conference Call Recordings Online
Dial-in number: 1-712-770-8055, Conference Code: 983459

Monthly Meetings | Recordings (3/20 Recording Uploaded)
Emotional Support Group Meetings


WI, IL: Wisconsin, Illinois sued over transgender name-change laws

[ – 5/1/19]

Attorneys sued Wisconsin and Illinois Wednesday over laws that forbid transgender individuals from changing their names if they have certain criminal convictions.

Both federal lawsuits argue that the states are violating free speech rights and are preventing people from expressing how they identify themselves.

“The impact on their lives is severe. This is an issue of equality and equal participation in society,” said Lark Mulligan, an attorney who filed the Illinois lawsuit. Mulligan, who is a transgender woman, noted “all the times that people are forced to use their IDs just to access basic services — applying for public benefits, applying for school, applying for a job or an apartment, anything like that.”

Cook County, Illinois, and Kenosha County, Wisconsin, are listed as defendants in the lawsuits, which say eight transgender women in Illinois and one transgender woman in Wisconsin encounter an array of challenges in their daily lives. The suits cited instances in which transgender individuals failed to get food stamps because their chosen name is not on their ID, or times when they were ridiculed in public places after showing identification that didn’t reflect their gender and chosen name.

The lawsuits seek to stop the states from enforcing their laws.

Cook County State’s Attorney Kimbery Foxx’s office said it hadn’t seen the lawsuit yet and doesn’t comment on pending litigation. Kenosha County District Attorney Michael Graveley didn’t immediately respond to a call and email seeking comment. Both prosecutors are named in the lawsuit because they would be the ones enforcing their state’s laws if any of the named plaintiffs changed their names.

In Wisconsin, registered sex offenders are forbidden to change their names and face up to six years in prison if they do.

The plaintiff in the Wisconsin case was born Kenneth Krebs but has been going by Karen Krebs since she came out as transgender in 1999, the lawsuit states. She’s a registered sex offender because of a 1992 conviction and can’t change her name.

“This causes confusion and raises questions whenever Plaintiff applies for a job, interacts with medical professionals, or seeks to manage her personal finances,” the lawsuit states.

Read more


We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...  
  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  • We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  • We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  • Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  • Please do not post in all Caps.
  • If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links.
  • We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  • We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites
  • Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

I can’t wait to see what pretzel knots the defendants and/or the judge twist themselves into in order to find a rational basis for such a law. I’m sure they will find some sort of public safety angle, which will be total BS to anyone with common sense.

I wonder if the eventual SCOTUS decision in the three recently granted LGBTQ workplace discrimination cases could have any bearing on this suit? It may not have direct bearing, as this suit is not specifically about workplace discrimination. But if SCOTUS says that workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity fall under the sex discrimination protection in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, it may strengthen the plaintiff’s arguments in this case, and in many others involving sexual orientation and gender identity. This case is really much broader than a sex discrimination case. It’s a First Amendment… Read more »

Foxx’s office won’t be able to comment since they’re up to their George Soros eyeballs with Just Jussie and the non-beatdown by two Nigerian brothers who identify as being paid to do the dirty work ala Capone’s family from back in the day. Joilet anyone?

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x