UK: Hundreds of rapists and child abusers taken off sex offenders register

Since 2012 at least 170 rapists and 157 child abusers were told they no longer had to register with the police. They include people convicted of raping boys and girls, incest, and taking indecent images of children. …

Theresa May brought in these new rules through gritted teeth after the Supreme Court declared that, with no right of review, requiring sex offenders to register their address with police and inform them of travel plans was disproportionate and incompatible with the right to privacy. Full Article


Half of Registered Sex Offenders Dropped From List to Protect Their Human Rights

Related posts

Notify of

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...


  1. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  2. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  3. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t
  4. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  5. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  6. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  7. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  8. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address.
  9. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  10. Please do not post in all Caps.
  11. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  12. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  13. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  14. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people
  15. Please do not solicit funds
  16. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), or any others, the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  17. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  18. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  19. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

never in America or maybe the beginning march 30:

” Theresa May brought in these new rules through gritted teeth after the Supreme Court declared that, with no right of review, requiring sex offenders to register their address with police and inform them of travel plans was disproportionate and incompatible with the right to privacy.

In 2012, when the rules came into force, the Home Office said police had to conduct a “robust review” and be “satisfied that it is not necessary, for the purpose of protecting the public from the risk of sexual harm”, for a sex offender to continue to register.”

Ya 347out of something like 47000. It a great strt and hopefully this rolls over to the us at some point soon.

Obviously, most individuals believe the registry is almost as good as a harsh prison sentence.

That’s what we need here.. an opportunity for review. The UK allows the police departments to handle it. Here I think we should at least be allowed a court hearing. Lifetime registration without review is a human rights violation. Applying the “not punishment” scheme retroactively is an even worse violation.

Seems like they have more due process and consideration for human rights violation in the UK then in the U.S.

One can only hope that this would roll over to the U.S. It will happen here. It has to at some point. Nothing is forever.

Let’s be clear: Although the registry in itself should be a violation, for all intents and purposes, the registry was PRIVATE. Only the police and, in some cases, pertinent personnel knew of the existence of these registrants. The public, by and large, were not notified nor had access to the registry information. This information was not available to citizens, even potential employers, unless the business was on the list was child-centric.

Having said that, a more valid comparison to the US can be made with regard to international travel. Individuals on the UK registry have to file itineraries (if they are allowed to travel), and in fact are banned from entering the US (just like Europe bans US registrants). So this ruling greatly affects those individuals, granted. But the difference between the day-to-day life of UK registrants vers US registrants are different as night and day.

David H wrote “I think if left to the police departments–they are in the best position to know who the bad g….”

Not if you’re in Dyfas-Powys in England where zero requests to get off the registry were granted or places like that. It looks like England is about 15 years behind the US following in our footsteps. If we box ourselves into using England as the standard to emulate than we’re just using our own shadow to justify the US’ registration ex-post facto add-on laws. And just asking for the US to use UK’s laws and principles as a standard doesn’t achieve that goal. The US has just gone nuts and is fighting, as Anonymous Nobody said, tooth and nail to defend any new laws. These offensive and disgusting unconstitutional laws are spilling over to proposed persecutions of ethnic groups now, as predicted looking at how Hitler started his carnage of killings with persecution of sexual deviants. I just read this week of 2 US states proposing registries for muslim immigrants. Ted Cruz, just today, said there should be police securing of muslim neighborhoods in the US, whatever that means. It does not sound very respectful of civil liberties. Let’s look to countries without registries as models of what we should aspire to.